Brotherton Iron Mining Co. v. Circuit Judge
This text of 1 McGrath 516 (Brotherton Iron Mining Co. v. Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To vacate order allowing amended declaration to be filed, to strike amended declaration from the files, to require plaintiff to pay certain costs and to file security for costs.
A judgment against relator was reversed with costs (75 M., 84). Afterwards.plaintiff asked leave to file an amended narr, 'and leave was granted; defendant demurred to the amended declaration, which demurrer was overruled; defendant then pleaded to the amended declaration, and moved for an order staying proceedings until the costs taxed in this court should be paid and for security for further costs, both of which motions were denied. Respondent answered that he did not make the order allowing the amendment to the declaration, and had not been asked to set it aside.
Denied November 18, 1891, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 McGrath 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brotherton-iron-mining-co-v-circuit-judge-mich-1891.