Brotherson v. Hodges

6 Johns. 108
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1810·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The nonsuit must be set aside, and a new trial awarded, with costs, to abide the event. Though all the tenants in common do not join in the action of trespass quare clausum fregit, the defendants cannot take advantage of the omission, at the trial, or in any other way than by pleading it in abatement. This is the rule in actions for torts. (1 Saund. 251. note g. h. where the authorities are all collected.)

Rule granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brotherson v. Hodges, 6 Johns. 108 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).

6 Johns. 108 (Brotherson v. Hodges) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Amsterdam Electric Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Rayher
43 A.D. 602 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)
Brown v. Ravenscraft
44 A. 170 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1898)
Van Hoozier v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad
70 Mo. 145 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1879)
Johnson v. Richardson
17 Ill. 302 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1855)
Rice v. Hollenbeck
19 Barb. 664 (New York Supreme Court, 1855)
Sheldon v. Slyke
16 Barb. 26 (New York Supreme Court, 1852)
Starnes v. Quin
6 Ga. 84 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1849)
Carlock v. Tappan
5 F. Cas. 76 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1843)
Hill v. Gibbs
5 Hill & Den. 56 (New York Supreme Court, 1843)
Fraser v. Hunter
5 D.C. 470 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1838)
Converse v. Symmes
10 Mass. 377 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1813)