Brothers v. McNeil

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Brothers v. McNeil

1 So. 3d 378, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 665, 2009 WL 211938

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 30, 2009

DocketNo. 1D08-2805

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 So. 3d 378 (Brothers v. McNeil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brothers v. McNeil, 1 So. 3d 378, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 665, 2009 WL 211938 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Clarence Brothers seeks review of a final order denying his petition for writ of mandamus in which he challenged the calculation of gain-time. We grant respondent’s motion to dismiss the proceeding as moot. Because official records indicate that Mr. Brothers was released from prison during the pendency of this proceeding, the proceeding is moot. See Phillips v. McDonough, 962 So.2d 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

WOLF, LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Clarence Brothers seeks review of a final order denying his petition for writ of mandamus in which he challenged the calculation of gain-time. We grant respondent’s motion to dismiss the proceeding as moot. Because official records indicate that Mr. Brothers was released from prison during the pendency of this proceeding, the proceeding is moot. See Phillips v. McDonough, 962 So.2d 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

WOLF, LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 So. 3d 378, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 665, 2009 WL 211938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brothers-v-mcneil-fladistctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack