Brothers v. Florida Department of Corrections
This text of 474 So. 2d 1239 (Brothers v. Florida Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant seeks review of an order of the Department of Administration dismissing his grievance petition against the Secretary [1240]*1240of the Department of Corrections. Appellant is a Correctional Officer II, employed by the Department of Corrections. On November 21, 1980, he was promoted to the position of Correctional Security Shift Supervisor I (CSSSI) at the Broward Correctional Institution. There is a probationary period for this position of 12 months, during which time the individual must maintain a rating of at least satisfactory. Appellant’s first evaluation in the position was satisfactory. His evaluation on September 24, 1981, was unsatisfactory, and on November 20,1981, his evaluation was given a conditional rating. This last evaluation contained the comment that “probation will be extended for 90 days. Reevaluate prior to 2-21-82.” On February 19, 1982, appellant was demoted from CSSSI to Correctional Officer II. The letter of demotion stated in part:
“As a probationary employee in the class of Correctional Security Shift Supervisor I, you have no appeal rights through the Career Service Commission.”
Appellant filed several grievances and appeals from this demotion. His appeal to the Career Service Commission (CSC) was denied on the ground that the Commission lacked jurisdiction because appellant failed to appeal within 20 days of the agency action. His grievance filed with the Department of Corrections argued the propriety of the performance ratings and actions by the institutional staff.’ Appellant has previously raised before the grievance committee that he was denied permanent status in violation of Florida Administrative Code Rule 22A-7.04. The Secretary of Corrections denied appellant’s grievance. Thereafter, appellant filed a petition with the Department of Administration alleging an improper extension of his probationary period. The Department of Corrections moved to dismiss on the grounds that appellant had raised the same issues before the Career Service Commission which were denied, that appellant has raised an issue for the first time in his petition, and that the extension of his probationary period was proper. The Department of Administration dismissed the petition and this appeal followed.1
The Department at the institutional level can consider untimely grievances and did so in this case. It was more than lenient with Brothers’ efforts to grieve and gave him full consideration and hearing, even where it was not required to do so. After this review, the Department found no errors in the procedures questioned by Brothers. However, the time requirement for petitioning agencies to consider grievances is not a necessary requirement for vesting of jurisdiction. Review of a demotion, on the other hand, is not subject to the grievance procedure, but shall be handled in accordance with the provisions governing appeals. Rule 22A-10.04(2) Florida Administrative Code.2 An appeal of his demotion by the appellant, seeking reinstatement, must be brought before the Career Service Commission which has the statutory and exclusive jurisdiction to hear the appeal.3 Section 110.305(3) and 110.305(5), Florida Statutes (1981).4 Said appeal must be filed [1241]*1241within 20 days from the date of receipt of notice from the agency.5 When Brothers’ appeal to the Career Service Commission was denied on jurisdictional grounds for failure to timely appeal pursuant to Rule 22A-10.05(3)(a) Florida Administrative Code, he had an additional 20 days from receipt of the notice within which to submit a written statement challenging the decision and then an appeal could be taken from the decision.6 This the appellant failed to do. He therefore forfeited any right of further review.
In summation, as a probationary employee, the appellant could not appeal a demotion to his previous employment classification. See Rule 22A-10.05(l)(a), Florida Administrative Code.7 If he was a permanent employee the only appeal of a demotion could be to the Career Service Commission, and if denied, further complaint of such denial must be raised within 20 days of any such order by further petition before the Career Service Commission. This the appellant failed to do. He therefore forfeited any right to further review. See Rule 22M 2.04(2)(b), Florida Administrative Code. In oral argument Brothers asserted that by this appeal he is requesting a hearing on his demotion by the Department of Administration. As previously stated, the Department of Administration has no jurisdiction of such matters and cannot provide Brothers with a hearing of his demotion. Therefore, the order of dismissal appealed herein is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
474 So. 2d 1239, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2061, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brothers-v-florida-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-1985.