Brothers v. Family Dollar, Inc.

465 F. App'x 236
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 13, 2012
DocketNo. 11-1971
StatusPublished

This text of 465 F. App'x 236 (Brothers v. Family Dollar, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brothers v. Family Dollar, Inc., 465 F. App'x 236 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony A. Brothers seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing Brothers’ action without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Brothers seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appeal-able interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Brothers’ motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
465 F. App'x 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brothers-v-family-dollar-inc-ca4-2012.