Brothers v. Family Dollar, Inc.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Anthony A. Brothers seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing Brothers’ action without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Brothers seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appeal-able interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Brothers’ motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
465 F. App'x 236 (Brothers v. Family Dollar, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.