Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Van Etten
110 A. 121, 90 N.J. Eq. 612, 5 Stock. 612, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 276
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis.
For affirmance — Tiie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Mintürn, Kaliscii, Black, White, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER-13.
For reversed — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Van Etten, 110 A. 121, 90 N.J. Eq. 612, 5 Stock. 612, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 276 (N.J. 1919).
110 A. 121 (Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Van Etten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Spencer D. Willey v. Bertha I. Willey, Allen F. Willey, Individually, and First Federal Savings Bank of Sheridan, Wyoming as Trustee of the Allen F. Willey Revocable Trust Dated September 12, 2001, as Amended and Restated On November 4, 2010
2016 WY 116 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2016)
Marte v. Oliveras
875 A.2d 969 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2005)
Acacia Mut. Life Ins. v. Bathurst
28 F. Supp. 781 (D. New Jersey, 1939)
State v. Fisher
113 A. 607 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1921)