Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority. No. A-715

489 U.S. 1301, 109 S. Ct. 1360, 103 L. Ed. 2d 802, 57 U.S.L.W. 3636, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 1342, 130 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3208
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 14, 1989·Published

Opinion

489 U.S. 1301

109 S.Ct. 1360

103 L.Ed.2d 802

BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD SIGNALMEN et al.
v.
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY.
No. A-715.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 14, 1989

On application to vacate injunction.

Justice BRENNAN, Circuit Justice.

Applicants request me, as Circuit Justice, to enter an order "immediately dissolving" the injunction issued by the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. I deny the application. In my view, applicants have not "established that there is a 'reasonable probability' that four Justices will consider the issue sufficiently meritorious to grant certiorari." Rostker v. Goldberg, 448 U.S. 1306, 1308, 101 S.Ct. 1, 2, 65 L.Ed.2d 1098 (1980) (Chambers Opinion).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority. No. A-715, 489 U.S. 1301, 109 S. Ct. 1360, 103 L. Ed. 2d 802, 57 U.S.L.W. 3636, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 1342, 130 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3208 (1989).

489 U.S. 1301 (Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority. No. A-715) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related