Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority. No. A-715

Supreme Court

Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority. No. A-715

489 U.S. 1301, 109 S. Ct. 1360, 103 L. Ed. 2d 802, 57 U.S.L.W. 3636, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 1342, 130 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3208

DecidedMarch 14, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 489 U.S. 1301 (Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority. No. A-715) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority. No. A-715, 489 U.S. 1301, 109 S. Ct. 1360, 103 L. Ed. 2d 802, 57 U.S.L.W. 3636, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 1342, 130 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3208 (1989).

Pincite

Opinion

489 U.S. 1301

109 S.Ct. 1360

103 L.Ed.2d 802

BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD SIGNALMEN et al.
v.
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY.
No. A-715.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 14, 1989

On application to vacate injunction.

Justice BRENNAN, Circuit Justice.

Applicants request me, as Circuit Justice, to enter an order "immediately dissolving" the injunction issued by the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. I deny the application. In my view, applicants have not "established that there is a 'reasonable probability' that four Justices will consider the issue sufficiently meritorious to grant certiorari." Rostker v. Goldberg, 448 U.S. 1306, 1308, 101 S.Ct. 1, 2, 65 L.Ed.2d 1098 (1980) (Chambers Opinion).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI