Brother International Corp. v. United States

44 Cust. Ct. 569

United States Customs Court·Decided February 11, 1960·No. Reap. Dec. 9596; Entry No. 824571·Published

Opinion

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeal for a reap-praisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiffs.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

[570]*570I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeal for a reap-praisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiffs.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

[570]*570I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Brother International Corp. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 569 (cusc 1960).

Pincite

44 Cust. Ct. 569 (Brother International Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.