Brother Industries, Ltd. v. United States

16 Ct. Int'l Trade 892
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brother Industries, Ltd. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 771 F. Supp. 374
United States Court of International Trade·Decided October 14, 1992·No. Court No. 88-11-00860·Published

Opinion

Aquilino, Judge:

The plaintiffs having filed a motion for judgment on the record compiled by the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“ITA”) sub norm. Portable Electric Typewriters From Japan Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 53Fed.Reg. 40,926 (Oct. 19,1988); and the court having granted in part and denied in part plaintiffs’ motion per Slip Op. 91-58,15 CIT 332, 771 F.Supp. 374 (1991), and having remanded to the ITA for further proceedings; and the ITAhaving submitted the results of those proceedings to the court; and the plaintiffs having filed a motion for a second remand thereof; and the court having granted in part and denied in part plaintiffs’ motion per Slip Op. 92-121,16 CIT 650, (July 28,1992), and having remanded to the ITA for further proceedings; and the ITA having submitted the results of those proceedings to the court in a document dated September 11, 1992; and the court having reviewed those remand results; and no party having objected to or otherwise commented on them; Now, therefore, after due deliberation, it is

Ordered, adjudged and decreed that the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce’s Final Results of Redeter-mination Pursuant to Court Remand dated September 11,1992 be, and they hereby are, affirmed; and it is further

Ordered, adjudged and decreed that this action be, and it now hereby is, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brother Industries, Ltd. v. United States, 16 Ct. Int'l Trade 892 (cit 1992).

16 Ct. Int'l Trade 892 (Brother Industries, Ltd. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brother Industries, Ltd. v. United States
771 F. Supp. 374 (Court of International Trade, 1991)