Broten v. Charleston County Detention Center

191 F. App'x 225
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 26, 2006·No. No. 06-6331·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James M. Broten appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Broten v. Charleston County Det. Ctr., No. 8:04-cv-01413-RBH, 2006 WL 361119 (D.S.C. Feb. 15, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broten v. Charleston County Detention Center, 191 F. App'x 225 (4th Cir. 2006).

191 F. App'x 225 (Broten v. Charleston County Detention Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related