Brossard v. Bateson

12 N.W. 196, 48 Mich. 292, 1882 Mich. LEXIS 814
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 25, 1882·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Marston, J.

This case was tried in -justice’s court, the set-off allowed and judgment rendered against the plaintiff, which on cerbiora/ri to the circuit court was affirmed.

There is no evidence tending in even the slightest degree to show that the plaintiff was legally liable for the suit of clothes furnished by the defendants to Capt. Jones. There was no gift of a suit of clothes, no authority given to Capt. Jones to order them and have them charged to the plaintiff, and no written or verbal promise by the plaintiff to pay for them.

The judgments of the circuit and justice’s courts must be reversed with costs of all courts to the plaintiff.

Cooley and Campbell JJ. concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brossard v. Bateson, 12 N.W. 196, 48 Mich. 292, 1882 Mich. LEXIS 814 (Mich. 1882).

12 N.W. 196 (Brossard v. Bateson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Union Trust Co. v. Casserly
86 N.W. 545 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1901)