Brossard v. Bateson
This text of 12 N.W. 196 (Brossard v. Bateson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case was tried in -justice’s court, the set-off allowed and judgment rendered against the plaintiff, which on cerbiora/ri to the circuit court was affirmed.
There is no evidence tending in even the slightest degree to show that the plaintiff was legally liable for the suit of clothes furnished by the defendants to Capt. Jones. There was no gift of a suit of clothes, no authority given to Capt. Jones to order them and have them charged to the plaintiff, and no written or verbal promise by the plaintiff to pay for them.
The judgments of the circuit and justice’s courts must be reversed with costs of all courts to the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 N.W. 196, 48 Mich. 292, 1882 Mich. LEXIS 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brossard-v-bateson-mich-1882.