Bross v. Bross

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bross v. Bross

493 S.W.3d 457, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 685, 2016 WL 3686292

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 12, 2016·No. No. ED 103237·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

David Matthew Bross (“Father”) appeals from that portion of the trial court’s judgment ordering Father to pay Paula Annette Bross (“Mother”) child support in the amount of $821 per month and to make a $14,000 marital distribution payment to Mother within sixty days of the trial court’s judgment. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence, is' not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.160⅛).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

David Matthew Bross (“Father”) appeals from that portion of the trial court’s judgment ordering Father to pay Paula Annette Bross (“Mother”) child support in the amount of $821 per month and to make a $14,000 marital distribution payment to Mother within sixty days of the trial court’s judgment. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence, is' not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.160⅛).

Bross v. Bross, 493 S.W.3d 457, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 685, 2016 WL 3686292 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

493 S.W.3d 457 (Bross v. Bross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.