Brosius v. McGaugh

27 Mo. 230
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedJuly 15, 1858
StatusPublished

This text of 27 Mo. 230 (Brosius v. McGaugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brosius v. McGaugh, 27 Mo. 230 (Mo. 1858).

Opinion

Richardson, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The practice of finding the facts in cases tried without a jury has been abolished, and in a case therefore commenced since the revised statutes of 1855 took effect, the finding of the facts'by the court can not be regarded for any purpose, as it has no place in the record. (Martin v. Martin’s adm’r, 27 Mo. 227.) Under the code of 1849 the finding was required to state facts and not the evidence ; and it was never the office of a finding to set out the evidence, and it was never treated as a bill of exceptions containing the evidence. The record in the case calls for a bill of exceptions, but" an examination of it will show that none of the evidence is preserved unless it can be inferred from the finding. The evidence then not being preserved, the instructions can not be reviewed. (State v. Vaughn, 22 Mo. 20.) The other judges concurring, the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. Martin's Administrator
27 Mo. 227 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1858)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Mo. 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brosius-v-mcgaugh-mo-1858.