Brophy v. Export Steamship Corporation

New York Court of Appeals

Brophy v. Export Steamship Corporation

189 N.E. 710, 263 N.Y. 587, 1933 N.Y. LEXIS 883

DecidedDecember 12, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 189 N.E. 710 (Brophy v. Export Steamship Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brophy v. Export Steamship Corporation, 189 N.E. 710, 263 N.Y. 587, 1933 N.Y. LEXIS 883 (N.Y. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgments reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, on the ground that the appellant’s proof presented an issue of fact as to whether, in all the *588 circumstances of the case and under the most favorable inferences to be drawn therefrom, the respondent failed in its duty to exercise reasonable care to protect the appellant from injury. No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Kellogg, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ. Dissenting: Pound, Ch. J., and Lehman, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgments reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, on the ground that the appellant’s proof presented an issue of fact as to whether, in all the *588 circumstances of the case and under the most favorable inferences to be drawn therefrom, the respondent failed in its duty to exercise reasonable care to protect the appellant from injury. No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Kellogg, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ. Dissenting: Pound, Ch. J., and Lehman, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 N.E. 710, 263 N.Y. 587, 1933 N.Y. LEXIS 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brophy-v-export-steamship-corporation-ny-1933.