Brophy v. Export Steamship Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brophy v. Export Steamship Corp.

240 A.D. 776

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 240 A.D. 776 (Brophy v. Export Steamship Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brophy v. Export Steamship Corp., 240 A.D. 776 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., dissent on the ground that there was a question of fact for the jury as to whether the respondent exercised reasonable care in the method of creating the passageway, and whether the contact by the truck, causing the cases to fall, could have been reasonably anticipated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., dissent on the ground that there was a question of fact for the jury as to whether the respondent exercised reasonable care in the method of creating the passageway, and whether the contact by the truck, causing the cases to fall, could have been reasonably anticipated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brophy-v-export-steamship-corp-nyappdiv-1933.