Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Brophy v. Brophy

Brophy v. Brophy

259 A.D.2d 443, 688 N.Y.S.2d 133, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3244
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 30, 1999
StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D.2d 443 (Brophy v. Brophy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brophy v. Brophy, 259 A.D.2d 443, 688 N.Y.S.2d 133, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3244 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sherry Klein Heitler, J.), entered July 13, 1998, which granted plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment for maintenance arrears, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff made a prima facie showing that she was entitled to contingent alimony, and therefore arrears. Defendant’s submis[444]*444sion of an affirmation from his attorney in opposition to the motion was insufficient to defeat summary judgment (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562-563). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Lerner, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D.2d 443, 688 N.Y.S.2d 133, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brophy-v-brophy-nyappdiv-1999.