Brooner v. Hanneke's Logowear, LLC

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brooner v. Hanneke's Logowear, LLC

389 S.W.3d 730, 2013 WL 69228, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 19

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 8, 2013·No. No. ED 98563·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mary Brooner appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her unemployment benefits on the grounds that she left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to her employer, Hanneke’s Logowear, LLC. We find that the Commission did not err in denying Brooner benefits. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mary Brooner appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her unemployment benefits on the grounds that she left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to her employer, Hanneke’s Logowear, LLC. We find that the Commission did not err in denying Brooner benefits. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Brooner v. Hanneke's Logowear, LLC, 389 S.W.3d 730, 2013 WL 69228, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 19 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

389 S.W.3d 730 (Brooner v. Hanneke's Logowear, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.