Broomfield v. State

804 So. 2d 357, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12522, 2001 WL 1007814
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Broomfield v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 788 So. 2d 1043
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 5, 2001·No. No. 4D00-3501·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant Appellant’s motion for rehearing and write only to note that our affir-mance is based on Hall v. State, 767 So.2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), review granted, No. SC00-2358, 790 So.2d 1104 (Fla.2001).

AFFIRMED.

GUNTHER, FARMER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broomfield v. State, 804 So. 2d 357, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12522, 2001 WL 1007814 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

804 So. 2d 357 (Broomfield v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. State
767 So. 2d 560 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)