Broomer v. Schultz

Third Circuit

Broomer v. Schultz

356 F.2d 984

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided March 16, 1966·No. No. 15485·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

While this action of dissident members of a labor union against officers and business agents of the union was heard on a motion for a preliminary injunction, all parties agreed to a final disposition of the cause without further hearing. The court, after setting out in an opinion, D.C., 239 F.Supp. 699, its analysis of the plaintiffs’ claims and such evidence as was introduced, denied relief.

We have examined the record and find no error in the reasoning or the decision of the trial court.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

While this action of dissident members of a labor union against officers and business agents of the union was heard on a motion for a preliminary injunction, all parties agreed to a final disposition of the cause without further hearing. The court, after setting out in an opinion, D.C., 239 F.Supp. 699, its analysis of the plaintiffs’ claims and such evidence as was introduced, denied relief.

We have examined the record and find no error in the reasoning or the decision of the trial court.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Broomer v. Schultz, 356 F.2d 984 (3d Cir. 1966).

Pincite

356 F.2d 984 (Broomer v. Schultz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related