Broome v. Consolidated Group

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedJanuary 4, 2000
DocketI.C. No. 514145.
StatusPublished

This text of Broome v. Consolidated Group (Broome v. Consolidated Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Broome v. Consolidated Group, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2000).

Opinion

The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Pamela T. Young and the briefs and arguments on appeal. The appealing party has not shown good ground to receive further evidence or to amend the holding of the prior Opinion and Award. However, pursuant to its authority under G.S. 97-85, the Full Commission modifies in part and affirms in part the Deputy Commissioners decision and enters the following Opinion and Award.

***********

The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered by the parties in a Pre-Trial Agreement and at the hearing on 18 February 1997 as:

STIPULATIONS
1. The parties are subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers Compensation Act.

2. An employment relationship existed between the deceased plaintiff-employee and defendant-employer at all relevant times herein.

3. American Insurance Company was on the risk at all relevant times herein.

4. The deceased plaintiff-employee was employed by defendant-employer from June of 1955 to 29 October 1957; from 7 January 1959 to 25 August 1967; and from 4 October 1967 to 17 November 1982.

5. The applicable compensation rate for the deceased employee is $385.90 per week.

6. The parties stipulated to the deceased plaintiff-employees medical records from Drs. Avinash D. Shah, Felix Evangelist and David E. Shanks.

7. The parties stipulated to defendants Answers to the deceased employees First Set of Interrogatories.

8. The issues presented are:

a. Whether the deceased employee contracted the occupational disease of asbestosis, and if so, when was he last injuriously exposed to the hazards of asbestos?

b. Whether the deceased employee contracted the occupational disease of mesothelioma?

c. Whether the deceased employee is permanently and totally disabled as a result of his asbestosis and mesothelioma?

d. What, if any, compensation is the estate of the deceased employee entitled?

The Full Commission adopts the findings of fact found by the Deputy Commissioner and finds as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. On 17 August 1998 the employee involved in this matter, Mr. David Broome, Sr., hereinafter decedent, died as the result of his mesothelioma condition. His wife, Mrs. Betty Broome, has duly qualified as executrix of Mr. Broomes estate and has been substituted as plaintiff in this action.

2. Having completed the ninth grade, decedent joined the United States Navy in 1951 where he worked as a boiler technician for two and one-half years. Decedents duties included maintaining and cleaning the boiler on the ship. Decedent was exposed to asbestos and asbestos dust while working as a boiler technician.

3. Decedent began working for defendant-employer in 1955. Decedent was initially hired as a "repeatman and was eventually promoted to a supervisor in the photo department. Decedent worked for defendant-employer for approximately twenty-five (25) years.

4. Defendant-employer is a textile printing roller company which makes cylinders for printing companies. Defendant-employers plant is at least seventy-five (75) years old and is a renovated cotton mill heated by two steam boilers.

5. In 1982, decedent went to work for National Textile Engravers, where he worked for six (6) years. Following his work with National Textile Engravers, decedent moved to Statesville and began working for United Engravers, where he worked for three (3) years.

6. Decedent worked on the upper level of defendant-employers plant for his entire twenty-five (25) years with defendant-employer. As a part of decedents job duties, however, he went to the graveaur area several times daily for 10-15 minutes each time. Decedent was also required to spend time in defendant-employers warehouse retrieving files and documents, as well as obtaining materials and supplies from the boiler room.

7. In approximately 1990, pursuant to an environmental assessment study of defendant-employers entire plant, defendant-employer contracted with Falcon Associates to remove asbestos from areas and equipment within defendant-employers plant.

8. Falcon Associates determined that there was one hundred and fifty (150) liner feet of asbestos pipe insulation in poor condition in defendant-employers graveaur area, which used to be the pentigraph and engraving area. Falcon Associates found asbestos insulation in defendant-employers warehouse and also found an old boiler and pipes in the boiler room which were covered with asbestos insulation. The floor area around the boiler was contaminated with asbestos insulation and had insulation coming out of its wrapper in the form of a white or gray sand-like material. The boiler room was dirty and dusty.

9. During the asbestos removal process by Falcon Associates, two men spent a total of nine hours glove bagging asbestos pipe insulation in the graveaur area and eighteen hours glove bagging asbestos insulation in defendant-employers warehouse. This asbestos removal process occurred after decedents employment with defendant-employer had ended.

10. Decedent was examined by Dr. David E. Shanks, an internist and pulmonary disease expert, in 1982. Dr. Shanks is also a member of the North Carolina Industrial Panel, Byssinosis Panel, the Industrial Panel and the Asbestos Panel. However, the Industrial Commission did not refer decedent to Dr. Shanks, nor did Dr. Shanks treat and diagnose decedent in his capacity as an Industrial Commission Panel physician.

11. Dr. Shanks diagnosed decedent with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis based on the history provided to him by decedent at that time. On 24 March 1994, Dr. Felix Evangelist performed a decordication on decedent due to an entrapped lung. During the procedure, Dr. Evangelist determined that decedent had mesothelioma in the left chest.

12. Decedent did not relate his history of asbestos exposure to any physician until late 1994. Dr. Shanks opined that because decedent did not work as an insulator, pipe fitter or in another similar position that decedent had no reason to know of or look for asbestos in his work environment. However, on or about 30 January 1995, when decedent reported possible asbestos fiber exposure from his job in the Navy, Dr. Shanks diagnosed decedent with asbestosis and mesothelioma related to decedents workplace exposure to asbestos.

13. In July of 1996, Dr. D. Allen Hayes, an internist and pulmonary disease expert, reviewed decedents medical records. Dr. Hayes opined that decedent has a malignant mesothelioma.

14. On 23 October 1996, decedent reported asbestos exposure within defendant-employers plant to Dr. Shanks for the first time. Dr. Shanks opined that decedents asbestosis exposure and the resulting mesothelioma was a result of his exposure to asbestos dust in the Navy and his exposure to asbestos dust while working for defendant-employer.

15. Due to his asbestosis and resulting mesothelioma, decedent did not work in any capacity for any employer after 23 April 1991.

16. Throughout decedents twenty-five (25) year employment with defendant-employer, decedent was injuriously exposed to asbestos and asbestos dust in defendant-employers plant, specifically in the graveaur area, the warehouse and in the boiler room.

17. During the time that decedent was employed by defendant-employer, he was injuriously exposed to the hazards of asbestos in excess of thirty (30) working days, or parts thereof, within seven consecutive months.

18.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Broome v. Consolidated Group, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broome-v-consolidated-group-ncworkcompcom-2000.