Broomall v. McCallion
8 A. 413, 5 Sadler 145
This text of 8 A. 413 (Broomall v. McCallion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Broomall v. McCallion, 8 A. 413, 5 Sadler 145 (Pa. 1887).
Opinion
These two cases were argued together. The controlling questions are the same in each. Interest in the question being tried does not legally disqualify a witness, otherwise competent, from testifying. The points were correctly answered, and the evidence was fairly submitted to the jury.
Judgment in each case affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cleland v. Casgrain
52 N.W. 460 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1892)
Culver v. Graham
21 P. 694 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1889)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
8 A. 413, 5 Sadler 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broomall-v-mccallion-pa-1887.