Broom v. State
258 S.W.3d 73, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 829, 2008 WL 2491758
Opinion
ORDER
Mark E. Broom appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Broom v. State, 258 S.W.3d 73, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 829, 2008 WL 2491758 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
258 S.W.3d 73 (Broom v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Broom v. State
173 S.W.3d 681 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)
Howard v. Turnbull
258 S.W.3d 73 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)