Broom v. State

100 So. 3d 135, 2012 WL 4222279, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15865
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Broom v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 So. 3d 52
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 21, 2012·No. No. 2D12-916·Published

Opinion

BLACK, Judge.

Anthony W. Broom seeks certiorari review of an opinion from the circuit court sitting in its appellate capacity and an order of the circuit court prohibiting Broom from filing further pro se pleadings in its court. We dismiss as untimely that portion of Broom’s certiorari claim challenging the circuit court’s opinion affirming the denial of a postconviction motion. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.100(c)(1). We convert Broom’s remaining claim regarding the prohibition from future filings to a direct appeal of the circuit court’s order and affirm the order without comment. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.040(c); State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).

VILLANTI and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broom v. State, 100 So. 3d 135, 2012 WL 4222279, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15865 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

100 So. 3d 135 (Broom v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)