Broom v. State

100 So. 3d 135, 2012 WL 4222279, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15865
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 21, 2012
DocketNo. 2D12-916
StatusPublished

This text of 100 So. 3d 135 (Broom v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Broom v. State, 100 So. 3d 135, 2012 WL 4222279, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15865 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

BLACK, Judge.

Anthony W. Broom seeks certiorari review of an opinion from the circuit court sitting in its appellate capacity and an order of the circuit court prohibiting Broom from filing further pro se pleadings in its court. We dismiss as untimely that portion of Broom’s certiorari claim challenging the circuit court’s opinion affirming the denial of a postconviction motion. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.100(c)(1). We convert Broom’s remaining claim regarding the prohibition from future filings to a direct appeal of the circuit court’s order and affirm the order without comment. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.040(c); State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).

VILLANTI and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 So. 3d 135, 2012 WL 4222279, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broom-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.