Broom v. State

504 So. 2d 531, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 884, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7411
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 27, 1987·No. No. 87-608·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Christopher v. State, 489 So.2d 22 (Fla.1986) (second post-conviction motion fails to show defendant did not know or could not have known of facts supporting his claims at time of initial motion); Witt v. State, 465 So.2d 510 (Fla.1985) (does not disclose justification for failure to raise issues in first motion); Smith v. State, 445 So.2d 323 (Fla.1983) (cannot raise appellate issues in post-conviction motion); and, Dobbert v. State, 456 So.2d 424 (Fla.1984) (may summarily deny successive post-conviction motion asserting additional grounds for claim of ineffective assistance of counsel).

RYDER, A.C.J., and FRANK and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broom v. State, 504 So. 2d 531, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 884, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7411 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

504 So. 2d 531 (Broom v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Broom v. Tucker
94 So. 3d 502 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)
State v. Broom
523 So. 2d 639 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)