Broom v. Jennings

Connecticut Superior Court

Broom v. Jennings

1 Kirby 392

DecidedFebruary 15, 1788

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Kirby 392 (Broom v. Jennings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Broom v. Jennings, 1 Kirby 392 (Colo. Ct. App. 1788).

Pincite

Opinion

By the whole Court.

Error is not to be presumed; and for aught that appears from the record, the damages were assessed right: for they were assessed upon a hearing of the parties, and the receipt referred to in the indorsement, might have shown an agreement of the plaintiffs to accept and apply the bills nominally,- or the defendants might have shown other payments; for they were not confined to the indorsement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the whole Court.

Error is not to be presumed; and for aught that appears from the record, the damages were assessed right: for they were assessed upon a hearing of the parties, and the receipt referred to in the indorsement, might have shown an agreement of the plaintiffs to accept and apply the bills nominally,- or the defendants might have shown other payments; for they were not confined to the indorsement.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Kirby 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broom-v-jennings-connsuperct-1788.