Brookville Insurance v. Records

5 Blackf. 170, 1839 Ind. LEXIS 75
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 18, 1839
StatusPublished

This text of 5 Blackf. 170 (Brookville Insurance v. Records) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brookville Insurance v. Records, 5 Blackf. 170, 1839 Ind. LEXIS 75 (Ind. 1839).

Opinion

Sullivan, J.

This suit was commenced by the plaintiffs as assignees of one Brown against the defendant, before a justice of the peace. A promissory note for fifty dollars, payable to Brown and assigned to the plaintiffs, was filed as the cause of action. The justice dismissed the suit for want of a sufficient cause of action. The plaintiffs appealed. The Circuit Court also, on motion of the defendant, dismissed the suit at the costs of the plaintiffs; from which judgment they have appealed to this Court.

It is contended that the judgment of the Circuit Court is right, because the plaintiffs, being a corporation, can only appear by attorney specially appointed; and, 2ndly, that the cause of action should have recited so much of the act incorporating The Broolmlle Insurance Company, as to show to the [171]*171Court that the plaintiffs are authorized to take the assignment of notes, and sue on them in their corporate name.

G. Holland, for the appellants. G. B. Smith and S. W. Parker, for the appellee.

The record shows that the parties appeared in the Circuit Court by their attorneys; and that, according to the decision of this Court in the case of The State Bank of Indiana v. Bell, May term, 1839, is sufficient

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Blackf. 170, 1839 Ind. LEXIS 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brookville-insurance-v-records-ind-1839.