Home/W.D. Missouri/Brookside Theatre Corp. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.

Brookside Theatre Corp. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.

11 F.R.D. 259
District Court, W.D. Missouri·Decided March 15, 1951·No. No. 6006·Published·Cited by 18 cases

Opinion

DUNCAN, District Judge.

Heretofore on March 8, 1951 the “Petition. for allowance of necessary costs and expenses incurred by plaintiff” was submitted to the court and evidence intrpduced in support thereof, and said petition was by the court taken under consideration:

The plaintiff has set out the various items which it seeks to recover as- expenses. The expenditures were made through the office of Mr._ William G. Boatright; through the office of Mr. Nick Spanos, and by W. D. Fulton and Stanley H. Schwartz in behalf of the plaintiff. The - items are as follows:

[262] eKoRGVRUT0bFFkRShrIyIs6OlCVKifMoKCiBjycklEoqLcq4hE1Wr/7/qMaKkeVS7eloByoaP0J4ZSzGkjKqiFkl/U8yIh/0QZSkRux6zE6FOGX9JFPYmI/2RUDEq3S2FFJKIUFaJKrqTZalSInhQJKyJlEdku9SXVdz6K4s8aN6PgiXWAF/OzHrVgKC/5OnNtfgtYvFBKuhGj8JTxUqm5P+FMzE3GwE+8WQinZpP5bEHNFqKuF7KkzOnCm1D0k6+VhzVHg4jIxdhYUbMlvyh3pZJbgJErInJbJPrky8/fiiTK6noj8c7je5njgH8blT7+o9aoBWAbpnfjyV+etZnIzlsk8IBpKHwDgMI3U+8nOIRjP5KVFhBxluELK24n0buu/+d+10f/amesNIbDBFbV0dPF/b7/H/Z6ejeHqeMbBhP4p87R0x3W2TsYD9xULI60NNTBbB//N6719P5gcD+F5GDBfcmFOl6fgE99qqf3qaPpsTqM5Hvh6OlK6gELPiosYOPsu1zo/eBE6c+4cUJ03Hi/E02+f8R73xP9Lh5s7tXe50TFwwjA0433OdG9mgAtbr85hOjOoV52Px3GBFjfrG0D6zvQVFDv3uVsHlxovQ/oEFwac9bsECM9+Q3jBDr1CUWEojJEpHxNRJdENEY+ZjAG+z/XLt6OK7Ill/RQZRXRIZ9kXaaziNrEg/oi8FJuYx62/PzV/eH6afDYhmHd06nyVw74lC4lW3sBMLu4dDadaX77NJTOdd3VN8ZwnMxmB7BYG0b08R7TzmTj1Ac204OiQTvMz8VzxvK99/EYNmGYdqKep/99wO3sWyersS4cuOtxHHf9tOVEirXhuQ2bWsVky69B7n+KLiM39we3/X8ct+0C0TF912/STJbs75eom/yYB67d7DrdFVCAr3A4f3/FsIZJIhuVFtVfx3dP5JqESwDEnX3JM6yw8zJo+OoaFr+41mpIlZvuffBsuWjikl5oEw36RQ3VTbepAOo01hK/nRbJWATUd3GB0to+EHtPbFQanvLcZViE06HEzQ8TnYlPq7P6PohGNXbAUyM8eoOzetc//ZvPujWvtggQ+b+7s7/Hpg/Q1jD/i0Ugqm6yr2UmaP00PEGr+M34N8J/93rzS+rqV/qvzg9C0oTm5tqaCPvKPey1IgL5akNznTMRQChqPbyJD9yeZCsnriYfxHTngvgzGD6UXezJ6MLLE5g9xrfRUFxKhEz2dUZ0tk/MrY8RcvPTpveq+68TqabWD4NhfpLXgJkGZtI9/fuNFfgyxvWHXj57Wi18G3B2CgoDcxZtq28USs79MPUAmP7ECKoVCiVn7cnrn7SuuM8WrgPhtOE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brookside Theatre Corp. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 11 F.R.D. 259 (W.D. Mo. 1951).

11 F.R.D. 259 (Brookside Theatre Corp. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

(PC) Holmes v. Sherman
E.D. California, 2023
Reazin v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.
663 F. Supp. 1360 (D. Kansas, 1987)
Milgram Food Stores, Inc. v. United States
558 F. Supp. 629 (W.D. Missouri, 1983)
Chemical Bank v. Kimmel
68 F.R.D. 679 (D. Delaware, 1975)
Farmington Dowel Products Co. v. Forster Mfg. Co.
297 F. Supp. 924 (D. Maine, 1973)
Federal Savings & Loan Ins. Corporation v. Szarabajka
330 F. Supp. 1202 (N.D. Illinois, 1971)
Advance Business Systems & Supply Co. v. SCM Corporation
287 F. Supp. 143 (D. Maryland, 1968)
H. C. Baxter & Bro. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
44 F.R.D. 49 (D. Maine, 1968)
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation v. Samuel Goldwyn
328 F.2d 190 (Ninth Circuit, 1964)
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn
328 F.2d 190 (Ninth Circuit, 1964)
Howard Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Company
324 F.2d 359 (Second Circuit, 1963)
Syracuse Broadcasting Corp. v. Newhouse
32 F.R.D. 29 (N.D. New York, 1963)
Prashker v. Beech Aircraft Corp.
24 F.R.D. 305 (D. Delaware, 1959)
Clapper v. Original Tractor Cab Company
165 F. Supp. 565 (S.D. Indiana, 1958)
Bank of America v. Loew's International Corporation
163 F. Supp. 924 (S.D. New York, 1958)
Manley v. Canterbury Corp.
17 F.R.D. 234 (D. Delaware, 1955)
Perlman v. Feldmann
116 F. Supp. 102 (D. Connecticut, 1953)