Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Brooks v. Willis

Brooks v. Willis

270 So. 3d 1274
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 13, 2019·No. No. 1D19-1053·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits. See Clark v. Nichols M.N.P. , 225 So. 3d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal).

Makar, Osterhaus, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks v. Willis, 270 So. 3d 1274 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

270 So. 3d 1274 (Brooks v. Willis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. Nichols M. N. P.
225 So. 3d 416 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)