Brooks v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brooks v. Williams

25 A.D.2d 864, 270 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4240

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 16, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 864 (Brooks v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brooks v. Williams, 25 A.D.2d 864, 270 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4240 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries in which the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $20,000, the parties cross-appeal as follows: 1. Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered June 22, 1965, which granted defendant’s motion for a new trial unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce the amount of the verdict to $7,500. 2. Defendant appeals from an order of said court, entered July 19, 1965, which denied his motion to dismiss the complaint and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, Orders affirmed, without costs. (See [865]*865Pfaffenbach v. White Plains Express Corp., 17 N Y 2d 132.) Plaintiff’s time to serve and file the stipulation consenting to reduce the amount of the verdict is extended until 20 days after entry of the order hereon.

Brennan, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries in which the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $20,000, the parties cross-appeal as follows: 1. Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered June 22, 1965, which granted defendant’s motion for a new trial unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce the amount of the verdict to $7,500. 2. Defendant appeals from an order of said court, entered July 19, 1965, which denied his motion to dismiss the complaint and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, Orders affirmed, without costs. (See [865]*865Pfaffenbach v. White Plains Express Corp., 17 N Y 2d 132.) Plaintiff’s time to serve and file the stipulation consenting to reduce the amount of the verdict is extended until 20 days after entry of the order hereon.

Brennan, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 864, 270 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-williams-nyappdiv-1966.