Brooks v. Wahn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brooks v. Wahn

18 A.D.2d 1096, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3885

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 22, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 1096 (Brooks v. Wahn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brooks v. Wahn, 18 A.D.2d 1096, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

three separate negligence actions, Henry A. Wahn, Jr., one of the defendants in Actions Nos. 1 and 2, appeals: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, made November 26, 1962 after a pretrial hearing in Action No. 1, which granted a preference in trial in all three actions; and (2) from an order of the same court, dated January 29, 1963, consolidating the three actions and according them a preference in trial under the same calendar number. Order of November 26, 1962, reversed, without costs, and preference vacated, without prejudice to a further application for a preference, if plaintiffs be so advised (Abramson v. Kenwood Labs., 17 A D 2d 626). Order of January 29, 1963, modified by deleting so much of its third decretal paragraph as grants a preference in trial to the consolidated actions. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

three separate negligence actions, Henry A. Wahn, Jr., one of the defendants in Actions Nos. 1 and 2, appeals: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, made November 26, 1962 after a pretrial hearing in Action No. 1, which granted a preference in trial in all three actions; and (2) from an order of the same court, dated January 29, 1963, consolidating the three actions and according them a preference in trial under the same calendar number. Order of November 26, 1962, reversed, without costs, and preference vacated, without prejudice to a further application for a preference, if plaintiffs be so advised (Abramson v. Kenwood Labs., 17 A D 2d 626). Order of January 29, 1963, modified by deleting so much of its third decretal paragraph as grants a preference in trial to the consolidated actions. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 1096, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-wahn-nyappdiv-1963.