Brooks v. Temple Sinai
176 N.E.2d 98, 9 N.Y.2d 917
This text of 176 N.E.2d 98 (Brooks v. Temple Sinai) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brooks v. Temple Sinai, 176 N.E.2d 98, 9 N.Y.2d 917 (N.Y. 1961).
Opinions
Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel and Foster. Judge Van Voorhis dissents in the following opinion in which Judge Burke concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hayes v. S. Stroock & Co.
283 A.D. 578 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
Claim of Kopec v. Buffalo Brake Beam-Acme Steel & Malleable Iron Works
106 N.E.2d 12 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)
Claim of Riehl v. Town of Amherst
124 N.E.2d 287 (New York Court of Appeals, 1954)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
176 N.E.2d 98, 9 N.Y.2d 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-temple-sinai-ny-1961.