Brooks v. Temple Sinai
176 N.E.2d 98, 9 N.Y.2d 917
Opinions
Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel and Foster. Judge Van Voorhis dissents in the following opinion in which Judge Burke concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brooks v. Temple Sinai, 176 N.E.2d 98, 9 N.Y.2d 917 (N.Y. 1961).
176 N.E.2d 98 (Brooks v. Temple Sinai) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hayes v. S. Stroock & Co.
283 A.D. 578 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
Claim of Kopec v. Buffalo Brake Beam-Acme Steel & Malleable Iron Works
106 N.E.2d 12 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)
Claim of Riehl v. Town of Amherst
124 N.E.2d 287 (New York Court of Appeals, 1954)