Brooks v. Sullivan.
This text of 39 S.E. 822 (Brooks v. Sullivan.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only question is whether, when a negotiable note is transferred before maturity as collateral security for a pre-existing debt, the assignee is such holder for value that he takes free from equities of which he had no notice. The “Negotiable Instruments” statute, Acts 1899, Chap. 183, secs. 25-21, settles that such is the case now to the extent of the debt secured, but that is a change of the law, which was previously otherwise. Holderby v. Blum, 22 N. C., 51; Harris v. Horner, 21 N. C., 455, 30 Am. Dec., 182; Potts v. Blackwell, 56 N. C., 449. This case is governed by the law as it stood prior to the act of 1899.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 S.E. 822, 129 N.C. 190, 1901 N.C. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-sullivan-nc-1901.