Brooks v. Sullivan.

39 S.E. 822, 129 N.C. 190, 1901 N.C. LEXIS 46
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 5, 1901·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

C-laRK, J.

The only question is whether, when a negotiable note is transferred before maturity as collateral security for a pre-existing debt, the assignee is such holder for value that he takes free from equities of which he had no notice. The “Negotiable Instruments” statute, Acts 1899, Chap. 183, secs. 25-21, settles that such is the case now to the extent of the debt secured, but that is a change of the law, which was previously otherwise. Holderby v. Blum, 22 N. C., 51; Harris v. Horner, 21 N. C., 455, 30 Am. Dec., 182; Potts v. Blackwell, 56 N. C., 449. This case is governed by the law as it stood prior to the act of 1899.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks v. Sullivan., 39 S.E. 822, 129 N.C. 190, 1901 N.C. LEXIS 46 (N.C. 1901).

39 S.E. 822 (Brooks v. Sullivan.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Standard Inv. Co. v. Town of Snow Hill, N. C.
78 F.2d 33 (Fourth Circuit, 1935)
Barnes v. . Crawford
160 S.E. 464 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
New Bern Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. National Bank
28 F.2d 554 (Fourth Circuit, 1928)
American National Bank v. Dew
94 S.E. 708 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1917)
Smathers v. Toxaway Hotel Co.
84 S.E. 47 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1915)
Sykes v. . Everett
83 S.E. 585 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1914)
Felt v. Bush
126 P. 688 (Utah Supreme Court, 1912)
Melton v. Pensacola Bank & Trust Co.
190 F. 126 (Sixth Circuit, 1911)
National Bank of Commerce v. Morris
135 S.W. 1008 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1911)
Graham v. Smith
118 N.W. 726 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1908)
Birket v. Elward
74 P. 1100 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1904)