Brooks v. Stroud

36 S.E. 960, 111 Ga. 875, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 874
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 9, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 36 S.E. 960 (Brooks v. Stroud) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brooks v. Stroud, 36 S.E. 960, 111 Ga. 875, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 874 (Ga. 1900).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

1. Under the facts alleged in the petition, the remedy at law was not as complete as in equity, and the court did not err in overruling the demurrer.

2. The evidence was conflicting on the material issues, and the judge did not abuse his discretion in granting the injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring. Injunction. Before Judge Reagan. Monroe county. June 14, 1900. Gabaniss & Willingham, for plaintiff in error. ¿¡tone & Williamson and Persons & Persons, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bryant v. Towns
170 S.E. 669 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Zorn v. Murray
56 S.E. 454 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Chatfield v. Clark
51 S.E. 743 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Johnson v. Thrower
44 S.E. 846 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Evans v. Piedmont National Building & Loan Ass'n
44 S.E. 2 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 S.E. 960, 111 Ga. 875, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-stroud-ga-1900.