Brooks v. State

258 S.W.2d 317
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brooks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 161 Tex. Crim. 73
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 27, 1953·No. No. 26458·Published

Opinion

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the violation of Art. 6687b, § 27, V.A.R.C.S.; and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $50.

The information upon which this conviction was predicated alleged that appellant “did then and there unlawfully drive and operate a motor vehicle upon a public [318]*318highway, to-wit: U. S. Highway Number 80, situated within said county and state, while his, the said Keith Brook’s, drivers license was suspended.”

In Hassell v. State, 149 Tex.Cr.R. 333, 194 S.W.2d 400, 401, we said:

“There being no such license as a ‘driver’s’ license known to the law, it follows that the information, in charging the driving of a motor vehicle upon a public highway without such a license, charges no offense.” See also Holloway v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 237 S.W.2d 303.

Because the information fails to charge an offense, the judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks v. State, 258 S.W.2d 317 (Tex. 1953).

258 S.W.2d 317 (Brooks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holloway v. State
237 S.W.2d 303 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1951)
Hassell v. State
194 S.W.2d 400 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1946)