Brooks v. State

272 S.W. 1115, 100 Tex. Crim. 252, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 426
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brooks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 93 Tex. Crim. 206
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 27, 1925·No. No. 8970.·Published

Opinion

BAKER, Judge. —

Appellant was indicted and convicted in the district court of Palo Pinto County for the offense of burglary and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without any bills of exception or brief upon the part of the Appellant.

After a careful examination of the record as presented to us. we fail to find any error disclosed therefrom and are of the opinion that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed, and it is accordingly so ordered.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks v. State, 272 S.W. 1115, 100 Tex. Crim. 252, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 426 (Tex. 1925).

272 S.W. 1115 (Brooks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.