Brooks v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Brooks v. State

1931 OK CR 125, 296 P. 1114, 50 Okla. Crim. 247, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 111

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 21, 1931

DocketNo. A-7754.

StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK CR 125 (Brooks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brooks v. State, 1931 OK CR 125, 296 P. 1114, 50 Okla. Crim. 247, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 111 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the connty court of Murray county on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor, and was sentenced to serve a term of 30 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $50.

The evidence reasonably sustains the verdict and judgment. No new question is presented. No error requiring a reversal is made to appear.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the connty court of Murray county on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor, and was sentenced to serve a term of 30 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $50.

The evidence reasonably sustains the verdict and judgment. No new question is presented. No error requiring a reversal is made to appear.

The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1931 OK CR 125, 296 P. 1114, 50 Okla. Crim. 247, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-state-oklacrimapp-1931.