Brooks v. State of New York
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SDE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BUS oe es LY eee ee eee nee cence neem ceennenennennX ELAS Ce BE JOSEPH A, BROOKS, SAME TN een Plaintiff, : 4 am | ‘f0- □ v. : ORDER STATE TROOPER TIMOTHY FINNEGAN, : 22 CV 6283 (VB) □ □ INVESTIGATOR TIMOTHY P. GOULD, and — : Dt Lene INVESTIGATOR JAMES WOLLMAN, A\ ‘5 2 | { □ □□□ L Defendants. . ( Copic vo Faved □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ conan cccacec mene messmo menses ok Cham. . . { ene nen eee een eee X Tes 6. eet L. Briecetty WANDA J. DURYEA, Plaintiff, : v. : TIMOTHY H. FINNEGAN, Formerly New : 22 CV 6300 (VB) York State Police, Badge #404; TIMOTHY P. : GOULD, New York State Police; and JAMES : WOLLMAN, New York State Police, : Defendants. : ene ne ee een eee ee ee □□□ sense nesses X Plaintiffs, who are proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, commenced each of these related actions on July 24, 2022, against defendants Timothy Finnegan, Timothy Gould, and James Wollman (the “State Defendants”),! (Brooks, at Doc. #2; Duryea, at Doc. #2). Because plaintiffs are proceeding in forma pauperis, they are entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service. The U.S. Marshals Service attempted service on the State Defendants at the police barracks for the New York State Police Troop K, Zone 3, in Somers, New York. (Brooks, at Docs. ##12—14; Duryea, at Docs. ##10-12). However, service receipts for the State Defendants were returned unexecuted in each case, and the receipts indicate the State Defendants are no longer located at the Somers facility. (Brooks, at Docs. ##12-14; Duryea, at Docs. ##10-12). In accordance with Valentin v. Dinkens, 121 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 1997), by January 13, 2023, the New York State Attorney General must provide the Court addresses where the State Defendants may be served.
Citations to Brooks refer to documents filed in Brooks v. Finnegan, 22-cv-6283 (S.D.N.Y. filed July 24, 2022), and citations to Duryea refer to documents filed in Duryea v. Finnegan, 22-cv-6300 (S.D.N.Y. filed July 24, 2022).
In addition, the Court sua sponte extends each plaintiff’s deadline to serve the State Defendants to February 13, 2023. If either plaintiff does not serve the complaint in their respective action within that time, such plaintiff should request an extension of time to complete service. Chambers will mail a copy of this Order to the New York State Attorney General’s Office at 28 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10005. Dated: November 10, 2022 White Plains, NY SO ORDERED:
Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brooks v. State of New York (Brooks v. State of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.