Brooks v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brooks v. State

567 S.W.3d 671

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brooks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 304 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 20, 2018·No. No. ED 106346·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mark Brooks ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his motion to re-open his PCR proceedings. Finding that Movant has failed to demonstrate that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion to re-open the PCR proceedings, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Mark Brooks ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his motion to re-open his PCR proceedings. Finding that Movant has failed to demonstrate that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion to re-open the PCR proceedings, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Brooks v. State, 567 S.W.3d 671 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

567 S.W.3d 671 (Brooks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.