Brooks v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brooks v. State

567 S.W.3d 671

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 20, 2018

DocketNo. ED 106346

StatusPublished

This text of 567 S.W.3d 671 (Brooks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brooks v. State, 567 S.W.3d 671 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mark Brooks ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his motion to re-open his PCR proceedings. Finding that Movant has failed to demonstrate that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion to re-open the PCR proceedings, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Mark Brooks ("Movant") appeals the motion court's judgment denying his motion to re-open his PCR proceedings. Finding that Movant has failed to demonstrate that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion to re-open the PCR proceedings, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

567 S.W.3d 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-state-moctapp-2018.