Brooks v. State
406 S.W.3d 489, 2013 WL 4419410, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 954
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brooks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 338 →
Opinion
ORDER
Jasmine Brooks appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 24.0351 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value.. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brooks v. State, 406 S.W.3d 489, 2013 WL 4419410, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 954 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).
406 S.W.3d 489 (Brooks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.