Brooks v. State
This text of 426 S.E.2d 914 (Brooks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was tried before a jury and convicted of violating Georgia’s Controlled Substances Act, i.e., defendant “did possess and have under his control and did sell, cocaine.” This appeal followed the denial of defendant’s motion for new trial. Held:
In his sole enumeration, defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. At trial, two undercover law enforcement officers testified that they paid defendant $40 for two bags of a substance which was identified as cocaine. This evidence is sufficient to sustain the jury’s finding that defendant is guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, of violating Georgia’s Controlled Substances Act, selling cocaine. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
426 S.E.2d 914, 207 Ga. App. 52, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 191, 1993 Ga. App. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-state-gactapp-1993.