Brooks v. State

93 S.E. 1022, 21 Ga. App. 142, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 478
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 31, 1917
Docket9059
StatusPublished

This text of 93 S.E. 1022 (Brooks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brooks v. State, 93 S.E. 1022, 21 Ga. App. 142, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 478 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

When considered in connection with the explanatory notes of the trial judge, attached to the grounds of the amended motion for new trial, and in the light of the entire charge, there was no error in the excerpts complained of, the evidence authorized the verdict, and,the new trial was properly refused.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 S.E. 1022, 21 Ga. App. 142, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-state-gactapp-1917.