Brooks v. State

913 So. 2d 731, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17018, 2005 WL 2806399
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brooks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 868 So. 2d 643
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 28, 2005·No. No. 5D05-2524·Published

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

William S. Brooks appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.800(a) motion for jail credit. He contends that he was not given proper credit for time served in the Columbia County jail for a probation violation in a Volusia County case for which he was later sentenced. Further, Brooks asserts that court records prove his entitlement to additional credit for time served. The trial court denied Brooks’s motion without explanation and without attaching or incorporating court records. We reverse and remand to the trial court to either attach portions of the record to support the denial of jail credit or to award the proper credit. See Friss v. State, 881 So.2d 38 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Walsh v. State, 866 So.2d 162 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Thomas v. State, 854 So.2d 743 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.

PETERSON and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks v. State, 913 So. 2d 731, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17018, 2005 WL 2806399 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

913 So. 2d 731 (Brooks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. State
854 So. 2d 743 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Friss v. State
881 So. 2d 38 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Walsh v. State
866 So. 2d 162 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)