Brooks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Brooks v. State

376 So. 2d 898, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15783

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brooks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 349 So. 2d 794 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 7, 1979·No. Nos. 79-482, 79-553·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The revocation of appellants’ probation is affirmed, but we remand for deletion of the finding that appellant Brooks violated the condition requiring payment of costs of supervision from the order revoking his probation. Appellant Brooks did not admit this violation, and there was no evidence to show that appellant was able to pay the costs. Coxon v. State, 365 So.2d 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

GRIMES, C. J., and SCHEB and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The revocation of appellants’ probation is affirmed, but we remand for deletion of the finding that appellant Brooks violated the condition requiring payment of costs of supervision from the order revoking his probation. Appellant Brooks did not admit this violation, and there was no evidence to show that appellant was able to pay the costs. Coxon v. State, 365 So.2d 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

GRIMES, C. J., and SCHEB and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.

Brooks v. State, 376 So. 2d 898, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15783 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

376 So. 2d 898 (Brooks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related