Brooks v. State
This text of 190 So. 261 (Brooks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Thomas are of opinion that the Judgment of the Circuit Court should be affirmed while Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Buford and Mr. Justice Chapman are of opinion that the said Judgment should be reversed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the judgment should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. *804 51, that the judgment of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 So. 261, 138 Fla. 803, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-state-fla-1939.