Brooks v. State

606 So. 2d 617, 1992 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 441, 1992 WL 171681
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brooks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 2552
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided July 24, 1992·No. CR-90-1693·Published

Opinion

ON RETURN TO REMAND

JAMES H. FAULKNER, Retired Justice.

This case was remanded to the Circuit Court of Washington County with instructions to hold an evidentiary hearing on the Rule 32, A.R.Cr.P., petition filed by Jessie James Brooks, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, 591 So.2d 586 (Ala.Cr.App.1991).

Pursuant to Rule 32.9, A.R.Crim.P., the court held an evidentiary hearing on February 19, 1992. The testimony of witnesses was taken, documentary evidence was presented, and counsel for both the State and the defendant argued the case. After considering the evidence and reading the brief presented by the defendant’s counsel, the court made specific findings that the defendant’s allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel was without merit and that the defendant had had a fair trial. The court therefore denied the post-conviction petition. The defendant has not filed any brief or any other documents with this court in opposition to the trial court’s order after remand.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by the Honorable JAMES H. FAULKNER, a former Alabama Supreme Court Justice, and his opinion is hereby adopted as that of the court.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks v. State, 606 So. 2d 617, 1992 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 441, 1992 WL 171681 (Ala. Ct. App. 1992).

606 So. 2d 617 (Brooks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brooks v. State
591 So. 2d 586 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1991)