Brooks v. Smith

45 So. 388, 120 La. 454, 1908 La. LEXIS 527
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 9, 1908·No. No. 16,618·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

MONROE, J.

Defendants (appellees) move to dismiss the appeal in this case on the ground that a previous appeal was dismissed because of the failure of the appellants to bring up the transcript within the delay fixed. The fact being as stated (Brooks v. Smith, 118 La. 758, 43 South. 399), the motion must prevail. When an appeal is dismissed for failure of the appellant to file the transcript in time, it is considered abandoned, and cannot afterwards be renewed. Code Prac. art. 594. Bienvenu v. Insurance Co., 33 La. Ann. 209; Succession of Llula, 42 La. Ann. 475, 7 South. 585; Mut. B. & L. [455] Ass’n v. Church, 49 La. Ann. 880, 21 South. 517.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks v. Smith, 45 So. 388, 120 La. 454, 1908 La. LEXIS 527 (La. 1908).

45 So. 388 (Brooks v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gazzo v. Bisso Ferry Co.
174 So. 132 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1937)
Richardson v. Henderson Sugar Refinery Co.
7 La. App. 273 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1927)
Rooney v. Checker Cab Co.
4 La. App. 173 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1926)
J. S. Terry Const. Co. v. James K. Sutherlin Co.
82 So. 384 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1919)
Vasquez v. Vasquez
62 So. 123 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1913)
Richardson v. Cobb
57 So. 889 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1912)
Girod v. Monroe Brick Co.
53 So. 582 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1910)
Brooks v. Magee
52 So. 551 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1910)