Brooks v. Shore
760 So. 2d 1093, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8055, 2000 WL 826948
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 28, 2000
DocketNo. 3D99-2500
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 760 So. 2d 1093 (Brooks v. Shore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brooks v. Shore, 760 So. 2d 1093, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8055, 2000 WL 826948 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
Opinion
Affirmed. See Mendelsund v. Southern-Aire Coats of Florida, Inc., 210 So.2d 229, 231 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968) (“Generally, there is a presumption that an attorney, as an officer of the court, is duly authorized to act for a client whom he professes to represent. In the absence of some pleading questioning the attorney’s acts ..., the presumption is conclusive.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jensen v. Sierra Grill, Inc.
876 So. 2d 1264 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Agean Investors Ltd. v. Ramos
783 So. 2d 288 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
760 So. 2d 1093, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8055, 2000 WL 826948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-shore-fladistctapp-2000.