Brooks v. Shore
760 So. 2d 1093, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8055, 2000 WL 826948
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 28, 2000·No. No. 3D99-2500·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Affirmed. See Mendelsund v. Southern-Aire Coats of Florida, Inc., 210 So.2d 229, 231 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968) (“Generally, there is a presumption that an attorney, as an officer of the court, is duly authorized to act for a client whom he professes to represent. In the absence of some pleading questioning the attorney’s acts ..., the presumption is conclusive.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brooks v. Shore, 760 So. 2d 1093, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8055, 2000 WL 826948 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
760 So. 2d 1093 (Brooks v. Shore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jensen v. Sierra Grill, Inc.
876 So. 2d 1264 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Agean Investors Ltd. v. Ramos
783 So. 2d 288 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)