Brooks v. Satterlee
49 Cal. 289
Opinion
The notice inviting sealed proposals was posted on the 4th of August, 1868, and after the opening of the office of the Superintendent of Public Streets on that day, and contained the announcement that no bids would be received after August 8, 1858, at 4 o’clock p. m. In accordance with our construction of the statute in Himmelmann v. Cahn, ante p. 285, this was not a posting for the full period of five days, as required by law.
Judgment affirmed.
Mr. Justice Rhodes dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brooks v. Satterlee, 49 Cal. 289 (Cal. 1874).
49 Cal. 289 (Brooks v. Satterlee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ferri v. City of Long Beach
169 P. 385 (California Supreme Court, 1917)
Haughawout v. Percival
119 P. 649 (California Supreme Court, 1911)