Brooks v. Rigney

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7| ANTHONY BROOKS, Case No. 2:23-cv-00982-GMN-NJK 8 Plaintiff, oly. Order

10] CURTIS RIGNEY, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiffs address is incorrect. See Docket Nos. 33, 34, 34, 36, 37, 40, 41, 43 (mail returned 13] as undeliverable). On December 12, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a notice of changed 14] address by January 13, 2025. Docket No. 39. 15 Plaintiff has failed to update his address. See Docket. A party, not the district court, bears 16] the burden of keeping the court apprised of any changes in his mailing address.” Carey v. King, 17] 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988); see also In re Hammer, 940 F.2d 524, 526 (9th Cir. 1991). 18] To that end, the local rules require that litigants immediately file with the Court written notification 19]| of any change of address, and expressly warn that failure to do so may result in case-dispositive sanctions. See Local Rule IA 3-1. 21 Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a notice of changed address by January 31, 2025. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF 23|| THIS CASE. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: January 16, 2025 26 FESS, 27 Unie IS Naaistrate Judge 28