Brooks v. Rigney

D. Nevada

Brooks v. Rigney

DecidedJanuary 16, 2025

Docket2:23-cv-00982

StatusUnknown

This text of Brooks v. Rigney (Brooks v. Rigney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brooks v. Rigney, (D. Nev. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7| ANTHONY BROOKS, Case No. 2:23-cv-00982-GMN-NJK 8 Plaintiff, oly. Order

10] CURTIS RIGNEY, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiffs address is incorrect. See Docket Nos. 33, 34, 34, 36, 37, 40, 41, 43 (mail returned 13] as undeliverable). On December 12, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a notice of changed 14] address by January 13, 2025. Docket No. 39. 15 Plaintiff has failed to update his address. See Docket. A party, not the district court, bears 16] the burden of keeping the court apprised of any changes in his mailing address.” Carey v. King, 17] 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988); see also In re Hammer, 940 F.2d 524, 526 (9th Cir. 1991). 18] To that end, the local rules require that litigants immediately file with the Court written notification 19]| of any change of address, and expressly warn that failure to do so may result in case-dispositive sanctions. See Local Rule IA 3-1. 21 Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a notice of changed address by January 31, 2025. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF 23|| THIS CASE. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: January 16, 2025 26 FESS, 27 Unie IS Naaistrate Judge 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7| ANTHONY BROOKS, Case No. 2:23-cv-00982-GMN-NJK 8 Plaintiff, oly. Order

10] CURTIS RIGNEY, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiffs address is incorrect. See Docket Nos. 33, 34, 34, 36, 37, 40, 41, 43 (mail returned 13] as undeliverable). On December 12, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a notice of changed 14] address by January 13, 2025. Docket No. 39. 15 Plaintiff has failed to update his address. See Docket. A party, not the district court, bears 16] the burden of keeping the court apprised of any changes in his mailing address.” Carey v. King, 17] 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988); see also In re Hammer, 940 F.2d 524, 526 (9th Cir. 1991). 18] To that end, the local rules require that litigants immediately file with the Court written notification 19]| of any change of address, and expressly warn that failure to do so may result in case-dispositive sanctions. See Local Rule IA 3-1. 21 Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a notice of changed address by January 31, 2025. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF 23|| THIS CASE. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: January 16, 2025 26 FESS, 27 Unie IS Naaistrate Judge 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Brooks v. Rigney, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-rigney-nvd-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack