Brooks v. Patterson & Son

176 S.E. 111, 49 Ga. App. 512, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 451
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 18, 1934
Docket23405
StatusPublished

This text of 176 S.E. 111 (Brooks v. Patterson & Son) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brooks v. Patterson & Son, 176 S.E. 111, 49 Ga. App. 512, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 451 (Ga. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence authorized the judgment rendered by the trial judge, sitting without the intervention of a jury, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, which contained the usual general grounds and two special grounds elaborating the general grounds. Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 S.E. 111, 49 Ga. App. 512, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-patterson-son-gactapp-1934.